Files
KArtSell.Aegis/tests/PHASE_3_EXECUTION_LOG.md
T
kjh2064 2d9d290961 chore: Start Phase 3 Crash Recovery Test execution (A+B parallel)
Phase 3: Crash Recovery Rehearsal (parallel with Phase 1)

Added:
- tests/PHASE_3_EXECUTION_LOG.md: Real-time execution tracking
  * 4 crash recovery scenarios logged
  * Pass/fail criteria defined
  * Evidence collection planned

- tests/PHASE_3_TEST_PROCEDURES.md: Detailed test procedures
  * Scenario 1: Outbox message loss recovery
  * Scenario 2: PostgreSQL connection drop recovery
  * Scenario 3: Hangfire distributed lock timeout (DEBT-015)
  * Scenario 4: Inbox message processing failure
  * Step-by-step procedures for each
  * Evidence capture and verification criteria

Execution Strategy (AGENTS.md v16.0):
- Parallel execution: 4 scenarios simultaneously
- Estimated duration: 15-20 minutes
- Prerequisites verified: Host running, SSH tunnel open, Job 893 active
- Target: Complete testing before Phase 1 finishes (50-90 days)

Current Status:
 Phase 1: Job 893 running (22:04 KST)
 Phase 1 monitoring: Automated (5-min checks)
 Phase 3: READY TO EXECUTE (now)
 Phase 2: Queued (Phase 1 results needed)
 Phase 4: Queued (Phase 2-3 results needed)

Next: Execute Phase 3 scenarios (START NOW OR CONFIRM)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 22:17:30 +09:00

4.6 KiB

Phase 3: Crash Recovery Test Execution Log

Start Date: 2026-08-03 22:35 KST
Status: 🚀 IN PROGRESS
Parallel with: Phase 1 (Job 893 running)


🧪 Test Scenario 1: Outbox Message Loss

Setup

  • Objective: Verify ShadowRunCompletedConsumer recovery from lost outbox messages
  • Method: Simulate message drop in Outbox table
  • Environment: Host running, Job 893 active

Execution

Step 1: Trigger message loss scenario
  □ Identify current outbox message
  □ Simulate deletion/loss
  □ Verify detection
  Status: ⏳ QUEUED

Step 2: Monitor recovery
  □ Watch ShadowRunCompletedConsumer logs
  □ Check retry mechanism activation
  □ Verify message re-processing
  Status: ⏳ QUEUED

Step 3: Validation
  □ No state corruption observed
  □ Message eventually processed
  □ Logs contain recovery trace
  Status: ⏳ QUEUED

Result

Status: ⏳ PENDING
Evidence: [logs will be captured]
Outcome: [ ] PASS  [ ] FAIL

🧪 Test Scenario 2: PostgreSQL Connection Drop

Setup

  • Objective: Verify graceful recovery from database disconnection
  • Method: Simulate connection timeout/reset
  • Environment: SSH tunnel maintained

Execution

Step 1: Trigger connection drop
  □ Monitor connection pool
  □ Simulate network disconnect
  □ Trigger reconnection
  Status: ⏳ QUEUED

Step 2: Monitor recovery
  □ Watch connection retry logic
  □ Check reconnection attempt
  □ Verify query resumption
  Status: ⏳ QUEUED

Step 3: Validation
  □ No data loss
  □ No duplicate processing
  □ Transaction consistency maintained
  Status: ⏳ QUEUED

Result

Status: ⏳ PENDING
Evidence: [logs will be captured]
Outcome: [ ] PASS  [ ] FAIL

🧪 Test Scenario 3: Hangfire Lock Timeout

Setup

  • Objective: Verify lock timeout recovery (DEBT-015)
  • Method: Simulate distributed lock contention
  • Environment: Multiple worker simulation

Execution

Step 1: Trigger lock timeout
  □ Create lock contention
  □ Trigger timeout condition
  □ Monitor fallback activation
  Status: ⏳ QUEUED

Step 2: Monitor recovery
  □ Verify DEBT-015 fallback mechanism
  □ Check job continues without blocking
  □ Verify other workers unaffected
  Status: ⏳ QUEUED

Step 3: Validation
  □ No deadlock observed
  □ Graceful degradation
  □ Recovery automatic
  Status: ⏳ QUEUED

Result

Status: ⏳ PENDING
Evidence: [logs will be captured]
Outcome: [ ] PASS  [ ] FAIL

🧪 Test Scenario 4: Inbox Message Processing Failure

Setup

  • Objective: Verify consumer resilience to processing failures
  • Method: Simulate deserialization/processing error
  • Environment: ApprovalQueueConsumer or AuditLogConsumer

Execution

Step 1: Trigger processing failure
  □ Inject malformed message
  □ Trigger deserialization error
  □ Monitor error handling
  Status: ⏳ QUEUED

Step 2: Monitor recovery
  □ Verify error caught by consumer
  □ Check DLQ (Dead Letter Queue) movement
  □ Monitor alert generation
  Status: ⏳ QUEUED

Step 3: Validation
  □ No data loss
  □ Failure logged with context
  □ Main pipeline unaffected
  Status: ⏳ QUEUED

Result

Status: ⏳ PENDING
Evidence: [logs will be captured]
Outcome: [ ] PASS  [ ] FAIL

📊 Test Summary

Scenario Status Duration Notes
Outbox Message Loss QUEUED TBD Recovery detection test
PostgreSQL Drop QUEUED TBD Connection retry test
Hangfire Lock Timeout QUEUED TBD DEBT-015 fallback test
Inbox Failure QUEUED TBD Consumer resilience test

Overall Status: 🚀 EXECUTION STARTING


🎯 Next Steps

  1. Environment verified (2026-08-03 22:35 KST)
  2. Scenario 1: Outbox Message Loss (START NOW)
  3. Scenario 2: PostgreSQL Drop (PARALLEL)
  4. Scenario 3: Hangfire Lock Timeout (PARALLEL)
  5. Scenario 4: Inbox Failure (PARALLEL)
  6. Evidence compilation (AFTER ALL SCENARIOS)

📋 Parallel Execution (A + B)

PHASE 1 (Background):
└─ Job 893: Running (50-90 days)
   └─ Monitor every 5 min (automatic)

PHASE 3 (Active Now):
├─ Scenario 1: Outbox Message Loss
├─ Scenario 2: PostgreSQL Drop
├─ Scenario 3: Hangfire Lock Timeout
└─ Scenario 4: Inbox Failure
   └─ 4 tests running in parallel
   └─ Duration: 1-2 hours estimated
   └─ Evidence captured per scenario

Status: 🚀 READY TO BEGIN SCENARIO TESTING