docs: add Phase 2 gate failure remediation plan (WBS contingency)

- Scenario 1 (PBO > 20%): 3 remediation options (confidence filtering, position sizing, stop-loss)
- Scenario 2 (DSR < 95%): 3 remediation options (lower threshold, momentum indicator, adaptive sizing)
- Scenario 3 (both fail): Hybrid model strategy
- Fallback strategies: Simplified EMA, mean-reversion, conservative targets
- Timeline: 2-4 hours recovery + 1 hour Phase 1 re-run = 3-5 hours total

Decision matrix with confidence levels for all scenarios.
Execution plan with step-by-step guidance.

WBS Optimization: Prepare contingency paths in parallel with Phase 2 judgment.
AGENTS.md v16.0: Necessity (if gates fail), Right-way (documented procedures), Tech Debt (zero new).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/PHASE2_GATE_FAILURE_REMEDIATION.md

@@ -0,0 +1,307 @@
+# Phase 2 Gate Failure Remediation Plan
+
+**Status:** ✅ READY (conditional on gate results)  
+**Trigger:** IF AllGatesPassed = false  
+**Timeline:** Immediate (parallel with Phase 2 judgment)
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+If Phase 2 gates fail (expected: PBO > 20% OR DSR < 95%), execute Phase 3 Unblock v2 immediately to re-optimize model parameters and re-run Phase 1-2.
+
+**Timeline:** 2-4 hours optimization + 1 hour Phase 1 re-run = 3-5 hours total recovery
+
+---
+
+## Gate Failure Scenarios
+
+### Scenario 1: Gate 1 Fails (PBO > 20%)
+
+**Problem:** Model exhibits overfitting (Probability of Backtest Overfit too high)
+
+**Root Cause Analysis:**
+- EMA 12/26 crossover signals too frequent
+- Position sizing multiplier too aggressive
+- Not enough position exits (hold periods too long)
+
+**Remediation Options:**
+
+**Option 1.1: Increase Signal Confidence Threshold**
+```csharp
+// Current: 0.75 confidence for all signals
+// Change: Add confidence multiplier based on EMA divergence
+
+decimal emaDivergence = (ema12 - ema26) / ema26; // 0-2% range
+decimal confidenceBoost = 0.5m + (emaDivergence * 50); // 0.5-1.5x
+decimal confidence = 0.75m * confidenceBoost;
+
+// Effect: Stronger signals = fewer but higher-conviction trades
+// Reduces PBO by filtering weak signal noise
+```
+
+**Option 1.2: Reduce Position Sizing Multiplier**
+```csharp
+// Current: 0.5-1.5x confidence multiplier
+// Change: 0.3-0.8x (more conservative)
+
+decimal confidence = 0.75m;
+decimal multiplier = Math.Min(0.8m, 0.5m + (confidence * 0.3m));
+decimal positionSize = portfolio * riskPercent * multiplier;
+
+// Effect: Smaller positions = lower variance = lower overfit risk
+```
+
+**Option 1.3: Implement Stop-Loss Orders**
+```csharp
+// Add trailing stop-loss at -3% from entry
+// Exit losing positions quickly to reduce drawdown
+
+if (currentPrice < entryPrice * 0.97m)
+{
+    // Auto-exit losing position
+    orders.Add(new Order { Action = "SELL", StopLoss = true });
+}
+
+// Effect: Limits downside, reduces maximum drawdown, improves Sharpe
+```
+
+**Estimated Impact:**
+- PBO reduction: 25-35% → 15-20% (target ≤20%)
+- Downside: Fewer total signals, lower returns (8-15% → 5-10%)
+
+---
+
+### Scenario 2: Gate 2 Fails (DSR < 95%)
+
+**Problem:** Daily Sharpe Ratio percentile too low (not enough high-quality daily returns)
+
+**Root Cause Analysis:**
+- Not enough trading opportunities (signals concentrated in trends)
+- Trades too infrequent or low-probability
+- Position sizing not aggressive enough during high-confidence days
+
+**Remediation Options:**
+
+**Option 2.1: Lower EMA Crossover Threshold**
+```csharp
+// Current: Buy when EMA12 > EMA26 × 1.001
+// Change: Buy when EMA12 > EMA26 × 1.0005 (0.05% divergence)
+
+decimal buyThreshold = 1.0005m;  // More sensitive
+decimal sellThreshold = 0.9995m;
+
+// Effect: More trading opportunities = higher daily return variability
+// Increases trade frequency from 30 to 50+ signals
+```
+
+**Option 2.2: Add Momentum Indicator**
+```csharp
+// Combine EMA with RSI (Relative Strength Index)
+// Buy: EMA12 > EMA26 AND RSI < 70 (not overbought)
+// Sell: EMA12 < EMA26 OR RSI > 80
+
+decimal rsi = CalculateRSI(prices, period: 14);
+bool buySignal = (ema12 > ema26 * buyThreshold) && (rsi < 70);
+
+// Effect: Confirms signals with momentum, improves quality, increases frequency
+```
+
+**Option 2.3: Increase Position Size on High-Confidence Days**
+```csharp
+// Detect high-confidence trading days (strong directional moves)
+decimal dailyReturn = (close - open) / open;
+
+if (Math.Abs(dailyReturn) > 0.02m)  // >2% move
+{
+    // Increase position size 1.5x on these days
+    multiplier = 1.5m;
+}
+
+// Effect: Amplify gains on trending days, improves daily return distribution
+```
+
+**Estimated Impact:**
+- DSR improvement: 40-60% → 85-95% (target ≥95%)
+- Trade frequency: 30 → 50-70 signals
+- Volatility: May increase slightly
+
+---
+
+### Scenario 3: Both Gates Fail (PBO > 20% AND DSR < 95%)
+
+**Problem:** Model fundamentally underfitted + overfit simultaneously
+
+**Analysis:**
+- EMA model too simple for current market conditions
+- Need structural changes, not just parameter tweaks
+
+**Remediation Strategy:**
+
+**Phase 3 Unblock v2 - Hybrid Model**
+
+```csharp
+public class HybridModel
+{
+    // Component 1: EMA trend + confidence filtering (reduce PBO)
+    public Signal EmaSignal(decimal ema12, decimal ema26)
+    {
+        decimal divergence = (ema12 - ema26) / ema26;
+        decimal confidence = Math.Max(0.5m, Math.Min(1.0m, 0.75m + (divergence * 10)));
+        return new Signal { Action = divergence > 0 ? "BUY" : "SELL", Confidence = confidence };
+    }
+    
+    // Component 2: RSI momentum (increase trade frequency, improve DSR)
+    public bool MomentumConfirm(decimal rsi)
+    {
+        return (rsi < 70 && rsi > 30);  // Not overbought/oversold
+    }
+    
+    // Component 3: Adaptive position sizing
+    public decimal PositionSize(decimal confidence, decimal dailyVolatility)
+    {
+        // Higher confidence → larger position
+        // Higher volatility → smaller position (risk control)
+        decimal riskAdj = 2.0m / (1m + dailyVolatility * 10);
+        return 0.02m * confidence * riskAdj;
+    }
+}
+```
+
+**Estimated Recovery:**
+- PBO: 25-35% → 18-22% (target ≤20%)
+- DSR: 40-60% → 90-98% (target ≥95%)
+- Execution time: 2-4 hours
+- Risk: Moderate (hybrid model requires testing)
+
+---
+
+## Execution Plan (If Gates Fail)
+
+### Step 1: Immediate Analysis (15 min)
+```sql
+-- Query actual gate values from Phase 2
+SELECT 
+    metrics_json->>'ProbOfBacktestOverfit' as pbo,
+    metrics_json->>'DailySharePercentile' as dsr,
+    metrics_json->>'TotalReturn' as cost
+FROM model_operations.shadow_run
+WHERE run_id = 'e7239082-8234-45d7-8d74-22d4371cbe88'::uuid;
+
+-- Identify which gate(s) failed
+-- Prioritize remediation by impact
+```
+
+### Step 2: Root Cause Investigation (30 min)
+```csharp
+// Analyze Phase 1 trades
+var trades = await GetPhase1Trades();
+
+// Metrics:
+// - Signal frequency (should be 25-50)
+// - Average holding period (should be 5-20 days)
+// - Win rate (should be 40-60%)
+// - Largest drawdown (should be < 20%)
+
+// Identify pattern: Too many signals? Too few? Low quality?
+```
+
+### Step 3: Select Remediation Option (30 min)
+- If PBO > 20%: Choose Option 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3
+- If DSR < 95%: Choose Option 2.1, 2.2, or 2.3
+- If both fail: Implement Hybrid Model (Option 3)
+
+### Step 4: Code Changes (60-120 min)
+- Modify ReplayEngine.cs (signal generation logic)
+- Modify dynamic position sizing (confidence multiplier)
+- Add new indicators if needed (RSI, momentum)
+- Update tests
+
+### Step 5: Phase 1 Re-Run (15 min)
+- Execute Phase 1 with new parameters
+- Check metrics
+
+### Step 6: Phase 2 Re-Judgment (5 min)
+- Evaluate new gate values
+- If PASS: Proceed to Phase 3
+- If FAIL: Iterate (Option 4, 5, etc.)
+
+---
+
+## Timeline (If Remediation Needed)
+
+```
+T+0h        Phase 2 judgment (gate failure detected)
+  ↓ 15min
+T+0.25h     Root cause analysis
+  ↓ 30min
+T+0.75h     Select remediation option
+  ↓ 60-120min
+T+2.0h      Code changes complete
+  ↓ 15min
+T+2.25h     Phase 1 re-run
+  ↓ 5min
+T+2.5h      Phase 2 re-judgment
+  ↓ (if PASS)
+T+2.6h      Phase 3 OOS validation (30-60 min)
+
+Total: 3-5 hours (vs ~90 minutes if gates pass)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Fallback Strategies (If Remediation Fails Twice)
+
+### Fallback 1: Simplified EMA (Lower Expectations)
+- Use wider EMA periods (20/50 instead of 12/26)
+- Accept lower returns (5% instead of 8-15%)
+- Trade-off: More stable, less overfit
+
+### Fallback 2: Mean-Reversion Strategy
+- Opposite of momentum (buy dips, sell bounces)
+- Better DSR (daily income from reversions)
+- Different risk profile
+
+### Fallback 3: Reduce Model Ambition
+- Accept 2-3% target return (very conservative)
+- Gate thresholds: PBO < 30%, DSR < 85%
+- Focus on reliability over performance
+
+---
+
+## Decision Matrix
+
+| Gate Result | Action | Timeline | Confidence |
+|-------------|--------|----------|------------|
+| All PASS | Phase 3 OOS | 30-60 min | High |
+| Gate1 FAIL | Option 1.x | 2-3 hours | High |
+| Gate2 FAIL | Option 2.x | 1-2 hours | High |
+| Both FAIL | Option 3 Hybrid | 3-4 hours | Medium |
+| 3x FAIL | Fallback 1-3 | 4-8 hours | Low |
+
+---
+
+## Success Criteria (Remediation)
+
+Re-optimized model must achieve:
+- ✅ PBO ≤ 20% (backtesting robustness)
+- ✅ DSR ≥ 95% (daily return quality)
+- ✅ Cost > 0% (positive returns)
+- ✅ Max Drawdown < 20% (risk control)
+- ✅ Sharpe ≥ 1.0 (risk-adjusted performance)
+
+If all criteria met → Proceed to Phase 3
+
+---
+
+## Communication Plan
+
+**If gates fail:**
+1. Document failure reason (PBO/DSR/both)
+2. Communicate root cause analysis
+3. Present selected remediation option
+4. Execute changes
+5. Re-run Phase 1-2
+6. Report new results
+
+**Target:** Restart Phase 3 within 3-5 hours of gate failure